GareyKinchen410
While you will find arguments on both sides of the debate, medicinal marijuana has several key advocates that give it a lot of credibility.
1. Consumer Reports - The organization has stated that folks who are suffering from AIDS or some type of terminal cancer, the benefits supplied by the drug seem to be much more significant than any of the risks, either those that are substantiated or the ones that are even suspected. They also argued that, for the same reason the FDA is quick to approve new cancer medications, they ought to also be lenient by using medical marijuana if you are terminally ill.
2. American College of Physicians - The ACP doesn't strongly argue in support of the benefits of medical marijuana, but they do argue that it should not be classified as an agenda I controlled substance. They reason that you will find circumstances that can be effective, which it's relatively safe when compared with other drugs with similar classification. They most strongly argue for legal protection for physicians recommending it or patients taking it on recommendation.
3. Jocelyn Elders, MD - Elders claims that the herbal remedy is less toxic than most of the prescriptions given by doctors every day. She also claims that there's "overwhelming" evidence showing that it's effective at easing the symptoms of some types of nausea, pain, and vomiting. It is especially beneficial for people coping with cancer, AIDS, and multiple sclerosis, or the medications they use to treat these diseases.
4. Donald Abrams, MD - Within the Annals of Internal Medicine, Abrams stated that AIDS patients who had either smoked marijuana or used the medication inside a pill includes a more effective defense mechanisms then people who had used an imitation version of the medication. In addition to this, they apparently were built with a better appetite, because they gained, on average, four more pounds than those who have been using the false version.
5. Judge Francis L. Young - Young is really a DEA Administrative Law Judge. He stated that the DEA should not prevent people from taking advantage of the beneficial effects of medical marijuana if they were in need of it. He stated that the 9-6-88 ruling clearly demonstrated several advantages of cannabis as a medical drug.
6. Gregory T. Carter, MD - Carter argues that Marinol isn't a replacement for marijuana, which contains several ingredients apart from the THC that Marinol is supposed to simulate.
7. Lester Grinspoon, MD - On the risks of the drug's use, Grinspoon from the Harvard School of medicine stated that the proof of marijuana's supposed health problems is lacking. As the drug has been "smoked widely" throughout Western civilization in excess of four decades, he noted there was not just one case linking using marijuana to lung cancer or emphysema.
