LenoreYun134
While you will find arguments on sides of the debate, medicinal marijuana has several key advocates that give it a significant amount of credibility.
1. Consumer Reports - The organization has stated that individuals who are suffering from AIDS or some form of terminal cancer, the benefits provided by the drug seem to be much more significant than any of the risks, either those that are substantiated or those that are even suspected. They also argued that, for the similar reason the FDA is quick to approve new cancer medications, they ought to also be lenient with the use of medical marijuana if you are terminally ill.
2. American College of Physicians - The ACP doesn't strongly argue in favor of the advantages of medical marijuana, however they do reason that it should not be considered a schedule I controlled substance. They argue that you will find circumstances that could be effective, and that it's relatively safe when compared with other drugs with similar classification. They most strongly argue for legal protection for physicians recommending it or patients taking it on recommendation.
3. Jocelyn Elders, MD - Elders claims that the herbal remedy is less toxic than many of the drugs prescribed by doctors on a daily basis. She also claims that there is "overwhelming" evidence showing that it is good at easing the the signs of certain kinds of nausea, pain, and vomiting. It's especially beneficial for people dealing with cancer, AIDS, and multiple sclerosis, or even the medications they use to treat these diseases.
4. Donald Abrams, MD - Within the Annals of Internal Medicine, Abrams stated that AIDS patients who had either smoked marijuana or used the medication in a pill includes a more effective defense mechanisms then those who had used a fake version from the medication. In addition to this, they apparently had a better appetite, because they gained, normally, four more pounds compared to those who have been using the false version.
5. Judge Francis L. Young - Young is really a DEA Administrative Law Judge. He stated that the DEA should not prevent people from benefiting from the beneficial effects of medicinal marijuana when they were in need of it. He stated that the 9-6-88 ruling clearly demonstrated several benefits of cannabis like a medical drug.
6. Gregory T. Carter, MD - Carter argues that Marinol isn't a replacement for marijuana, which contains several ingredients other than the THC that Marinol is supposed to simulate.
7. Lester Grinspoon, MD - On the risks of the drug's use, Grinspoon from the Harvard School of medicine stated that the proof of marijuana's supposed health risks is lacking. While the drug continues to be "smoked widely" throughout Western civilization in excess of four decades, he noted that there hasn't been just one case linking using marijuana to cancer of the lung or emphysema.
